Greg Allen is Speaking at The Advocates’ Society’s Trial and Error Program

AMLC is excited to share that Greg Allen will be part of the faculty at The Advocates’ Society’s Trial and Error: Learn From the Best What Not to Do in Court program scheduled for May 8, 2026.

During this program, Greg will be speaking on two topics. He will join Alexandra Cocks from McCarthy Tetrault and The Honorable Justice Ward Branch to discuss How Not to Start the Trial. He will also be joining Tracey Cohen from Fasken Martineau DuMoulin, Taylor-Marie Young from Rush Ilhas Hardwick, and The Honorable Justice Palbinder Kaur Shergill to discuss How Not to Cross Examine.

Learn more and register now at Trial and Error: Learn From the Best What Not to Do in Court

Greg is named Excellence Awardee for Litigator of the Year

AMLC is proud to share that Greg Allen has been named an Excellence Awardee for Litigator of the Year in this year’s Lexpert Canadian Law Awards.

Greg and Wes will be attending the awards on May 5 in Toronto. Congratulation to Greg on this achievement!

Learn more here: 2026 Winners & Excellence Awardees - Canadian Law Awards | Lexpert

Greg and Wes are in the 2026 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory

AMLC is proud to share that Greg Allen and Wes McMillan are appearing in the 2026 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory. Congratulations to both of them for this recognition! 

Learn more about their recognition and the directory: Wes McMillan - Allen / McMillan Litigation Counsel | Lexpert and Greg J. Allen - Allen / McMillan Litigation Counsel | Lexpert

‍ ‍

AMLC is Shortlisted for Litigation Boutique Firm of the Year by Benchmark Litigation Canada

AMLC is proud to have been shortlisted once again for Litigation Boutique Firm of the Year by Benchmark Litigation Canada. 

Benchmark Litigation Canada recognizes litigators and law firms nationwide based on months of peer review-based research and submissions from firms. The Benchmark Litigation Canada awards ceremony will take place in Toronto on May 7. Wes and Greg will be attending on behalf of AMLC. You can view the full shortlist for the awards here.

Wes McMillan and Alina Chekh Speaking at CLEBC’s Real Estate Litigation Program

AMLC is excited to share that Wes McMillan will be the chair and Alina Chekh will be on the faculty of the CLEBC Real Estate Litigation program scheduled for April 10, 2026.

The program examines key developments shaping real estate litigation, from strategic drafting before litigation begins to managing solicitors’ risk and practical approaches to preserving property once a dispute is underway. Faculty will also walk through real-world scenarios that connect legal principles with the decisions lawyers face in everyday practice.

Learn more at Real Estate Litigation 2026 | CLE BC Online Store

AMLC Legal Insights - Protecting Pre-Sale Deposits: BC Court Rules on Late Disclosure Amendments

By Alina Chekh

A 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ye v. Vesta Properties (Latimer) Ltd., 2025 BCSC 773, demonstrates how pre-sale purchasers can assert their rights when developers fail to provide timely disclosure. The Court held that purchasers were entitled to rescind their contracts and recover their deposits after the developer failed to promptly notify them of a one-year acceleration in the estimated completion date.

The decision highlights the legal consequences that can arise when developers do not provide timely updates to disclosure statements under the Real Estate Development Marketing Act (“REDMA”).

Background​

​In March 2022, the purchasers entered into contracts to buy six pre-sale strata units in a multi-phased development project in Langley, British Columbia.

The dispute arose when the developer accelerated the estimated completion window by one year. On February 29, 2024, the developer filed an amendment with the Superintendent revising the completion window from October–December 2025 to October–December 2024. However, the amendment was not delivered to the purchasers until August 28, 2024, just over a month before the revised completion window began. As a result, the purchasers had limited time to prepare for early possession and the associated strata fees and carrying costs.

The purchasers commenced an action in October 2024. The developer subsequently issued notices to complete and alleged default after the purchasers refused to close.

​Decision

The Court held that the developer breached section 16 of the REDMA by failing to provide timely notice of a one-year acceleration in the estimated completion date.

The one-year acceleration was a material fact because it directly affected the purchasers’ financial planning, including their ability to prepare for strata fees, mortgage obligations and other carrying costs. The Court confirmed, citing McEachern v. 752265 B.C. Ltd., 2009 BCSC 1290, that significant changes to completion timelines may justify rescission.

Although the developer filed the amendment with the Superintendent within 30 days, it was not delivered to the purchasers for six months. During that period, the purchasers reasonably understood that completion would not occur until October 2025. When the developer later imposed a final completion date on short notice, it did not ameliorate the prejudice caused by the late notice but instead compounded it.

The Court concluded that:

1. The one-year acceleration rendered the original disclosure statement materially false or misleading, triggering the requirement for an amendment under section 16(1)(a)(ii) of the REDMA; and

2. The developer’s failure to provide the amendment to purchasers within a reasonable time, in breach of section 16(1)(b), entitled the purchasers to rescind the contracts under section 23(1) of the REDMA.

Key Takeaways​ for Purchasers

This case illustrates how the REDMA protects purchasers who enter into pre-sale contracts:

· Developers must promptly deliver amendments to disclosure statements when material facts change;

· Significant changes to construction timelines may constitute a “material fact” under the REDMA; and

· When developers fail to comply with the REDMA disclosure obligations, purchasers may be entitled to rescind their contracts and recover their deposits.

If you are a pre-sale purchaser facing unexpected changes to completion dates, undisclosed amendments, or other potential REDMA violations, experienced litigation counsel can help you assess your rights and available remedies.. ​

Download a PDF copy of AMLC Legal Insights

AMLC Legal Insights are intended for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or opinion.